Last month, I watched Fellowship of the Ring again. It is an amazing movie, and I watched all 17 hours of bonus commentary. However...!
Aragorn is obsessed with the "weakness that runs in his veins" because he is inherited from Isildur. Three thousand years ago! Even if his ancestors had children at age 50, that's 60 generations! He is only 0.000000000000000086% blood from Isildur by this point! [1] We should be far more concerned whether his more recent ancestors have weakness in their blood or not.
Also, the story makes a huge deal about how Aragorn is the ONLY ONE who can unite Gondor. At one point, it looks like Aragorn will refuse, and Boromir goes on about how the race of men will fail now, and the White City will come to ruin. There is no one else in all the tens of thousands in Gondor who can lead? In 3000 years, not a single other leader emerged? We have to wait for Aragorn with his 0.000000000000000086% royal blood (blood tainted by weakness, no less)?
Other than these problems, Lord of the Rings has great lessons. Throughout many pre-launch moments on my software projects when it was "darkest before the dawn", I reminded myself and others that the journey always feels gritty and broken while you're in it. One does not simply walk into Mordor. It's only afterwards that the epic elf songs are written and sung throughout centuries. While you're trekking to Mount Doom, it does not feel epic at all!
Also Lord of the Rings teaches us that even a hobbit (or two, since Frodo had a cofounder) can contend with the will of Sauron.
But the nepotism is lame! Some random dude in Gondor should have risen up and said, "Hey, I'm a great leader too, how about we stop waiting decades for Aragorn and just unite under me instead?" and they should have gotten on with it.
[1] computed via (0.5)^60
Aragorn is obsessed with the "weakness that runs in his veins" because he is inherited from Isildur. Three thousand years ago! Even if his ancestors had children at age 50, that's 60 generations! He is only 0.000000000000000086% blood from Isildur by this point! [1] We should be far more concerned whether his more recent ancestors have weakness in their blood or not.
Also, the story makes a huge deal about how Aragorn is the ONLY ONE who can unite Gondor. At one point, it looks like Aragorn will refuse, and Boromir goes on about how the race of men will fail now, and the White City will come to ruin. There is no one else in all the tens of thousands in Gondor who can lead? In 3000 years, not a single other leader emerged? We have to wait for Aragorn with his 0.000000000000000086% royal blood (blood tainted by weakness, no less)?
Other than these problems, Lord of the Rings has great lessons. Throughout many pre-launch moments on my software projects when it was "darkest before the dawn", I reminded myself and others that the journey always feels gritty and broken while you're in it. One does not simply walk into Mordor. It's only afterwards that the epic elf songs are written and sung throughout centuries. While you're trekking to Mount Doom, it does not feel epic at all!
Also Lord of the Rings teaches us that even a hobbit (or two, since Frodo had a cofounder) can contend with the will of Sauron.
But the nepotism is lame! Some random dude in Gondor should have risen up and said, "Hey, I'm a great leader too, how about we stop waiting decades for Aragorn and just unite under me instead?" and they should have gotten on with it.
[1] computed via (0.5)^60